... and Proctor and Gamble (prolific producers of potty paper) is UP 1.15
today...
----- Original Message -----
From: ClassicVW@xxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical
orelectronic s...
I wrote:
> I have no idea what an OM-3 will be worth in 20 years, but I sure as hell
> ain't buying them up as an investment. See my point? There are many many
> better choices for collectors to collect, than OMs!
>
T. Clausen replied:
Somehow, I doubt that financial gain is the purpose of "collectors". I'd
call anyone buying OM-gear for financial gain an "investor" (which, imo,
is just as ok), not a collector.
In the context I was using the word- "collector" I did mean 'for financial
gain'. If you bothered to notice what I was referring to, a previous post in
this thread, you'd have understood. And also notice I did use the word
'investment' in my post, so what is your freaking point of your comment, to
lecture me? Are you really THAT anal?
George S.
|