Hi!
Thanks for all your answers I am not sure yet but i think I will decide
for 2.8 because of brightness
Thanks!
Marcin
"John A. Lind" wrote:
> And now for the opposing viewpoint:
> OK, not really an opposing one, just an alternate.
> I have a multi-coated 135mm f/2.8 and wouldn't trade or sell it. Performs
> very well, even wide open. Yes, it's a little heavier and larger with a
> 55mm filter ring, but still smaller and lighter than other OEM lenses in
> this length/speed, and it can easily be hand held. However, since my
> Zuiko's are the faster lenses and most of them have a 55mm filter ring this
> is not a problem. Note that f/3.5 is actually 2/3 stop slower than f/2.8
> (therefore 1/3 stop faster than f/4). The biggest advantage for me is the
> brighter viewfinder with easier focusing in lower light levels, and this is
> one of the lenses I periodically use wide open. I suggest you think about
> which you prefer most: the brighter viewfinder and speed, or the smaller
> size and weight with 49mm filter ring.
>
> -- John
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
> -------------------- [POLBOX - REKLAMA] ------------------------
> Sprawd? swoje bezpieczeñstwo w Sieci
> Zabezpiecz siê ! www.symantec.com/region/pl/product/nis2001.html
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------- [POLBOX - REKLAMA] ------------------------
Sprawd? swoje bezpieczeñstwo w Sieci
Zabezpiecz siê ! www.symantec.com/region/pl/product/nis2001.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|