Subject: | RE: [OM] Introduction and 135's question - pictures |
---|---|
From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:40:31 +1000 |
Erwin wrote: > > It is also a very good portrait lens with excellent bokeh: > Yes, I've found it a good focal length for portraits, definitely acceptably sharp even wide open. By the way (shameless plug), I have one for sale, I don't really need 2 of the 3.5s plus a 2.8. By the way, does anyone have any comments about the Tamron 135mm f2.5 ? ...Wayne < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] Quoting garbage, part 12, 864, Steve Dropkin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] 40/2 lens hood/flair, Tony Winkless |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Introduction and 135's question - pictures, Erwin Voogt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Introduction and 135's question - pictures, Daryl Hurley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |