Subject: | [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2 |
---|---|
From: | "Dave Bulger" <david_bulger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 4 May 2001 06:25:07 -0500 |
Zuiks, I've got both the Zuiko 90/2 and the 100/2. Other than 10mm, what is the 100/2 giving me that the 90/2 doesn't, other than the warm, fuzzy feeling instigated by that wiiiide expanse of front element glass on the 100/2? Is there any significant difference in picture quality, bokeh, etc? Thanks, Dave < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] re: Help, Acer V |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] [OT] El Nikkor..., Donald MacDonald |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] re: Help, Acer V |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, Tom Scales |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |