The foundation line at the bottom is probably the more damning. It doesn't
look like you're completely square to the wall, unless one wants to argue
that the lens distorts more on the right side than the left. In other words,
you won't get an argument from me that there is no distortion, but this
seems to exaggerate the effect a little bit. Do masons in Holland drink
during lunch? Maybe you need to find a wall that was put up in the morning.
<G>
I don't enjoy your photo, though if I could only take one lens, this is
still unquestionably the lens I'd take. On my deserted island, there are
fortunately no brick walls. ;-)
Joel W.
From: "Olaf Greve" <olaf_greve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
The results, which will not be liked by 35-80/2.8 owners can be seen here:
http://www.millennics.com/olympus/various/35-80.html
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|