Subject: | Re: [OM] XA or Epic? |
---|---|
From: | "John Prosper" <japrosper@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:36:44 -0600 |
From: "John Pendley" <jpendley@xxxxxxx> Hi Doris, My "XA or Epic?" dilemma has develod hyperthyroidism. It seems that now I don't want to settle for anything less than a Konica Hexar. Better yetwould be a Hexar RF with interchangeable lenses or Besser R. At the moment,I'm impressed with what I've read about Konica optics and not so impressed with what I've read of the Voigtlander body. Any thoughts? As background, if you haven't picked up on this already, I have a long history with Leica. So one of my options is to buy some lenses for my M3; but I really don't like the M3: no 35mm bright line. Why don't you end all the agony by getting all three: the Epic, the XA & the Hexar RF? ;-) John _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] XA or Epic?, John Pendley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] OM-2S, Tokina 28-70, BIN, $185, Tom Scales |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] XA or Epic?, ClassicVW |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] XA or Epic?, John Pendley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |