The 300/4.5 is not smaller than the 85-250. It may be a touch shorter, but
it is a lot bigger around (72mm filter). I would guess, without checking
the esif, that the 300 is heavier too.
Tom
> > There has been a lot of discussion lately about the Tamron 60-300 zoom.
That
> > is a very good lens and costs less than the Zuiko 85-250. The Zuiko 300
is
> > great and works well with the 1.4 and 2x multipliers. So many
choices....
> > /jnm
>
> Yes, I'll add this one to the list. Only concern is about size. Anyone
> do a side by side of the 60-300 and 85-250? I assume the 300/4.5 is much
> smaller. I've read the specs but there is nothing like holding one in
> your hand... or carrying it in your pack.
>
> Mike
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|