On Thu, 8 Mar 2001 23:11:33 -0500, John Hermanson wrote:
>The percentage of double exposure pictures compared to regular pictures has
>got to be so low, it's funny how a camera will be rated by it's inclusion
>of that feature, even though it will almost never be used, or will be
>ignored once the charm has worn off.
An excellent point. In the past 25 years, I've probably shot fewer
than 25 intentional double exposures, of which only 2 or 3 were worth
the effort. While I'm sure that the double exposure is a critical
technique for some photographers, I suspect that for most of us it
is, at best, a novelty effect only used occasionally.
BB
-
B.B. Bean bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bean & Bean Cotton Co/Bean Farms http://www.beancotton.com
Peach Orchard, MO
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|