On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, John Hermanson wrote:
<SNIP>
> The percentage of double exposure pictures compared to regular pictures has
> got to be so low, it's funny how a camera will be rated by it's inclusion
> of that feature, even though it will almost never be used, or will be
> ignored once the charm has worn off.
>
> John Hermanson
<SNIP>
Interresting thought, John. I know I never did any double-exposures other
than the mandatory one or two to test out the techniques. I never found
any good subjects inspireing me to do something I couldn't do just as well
(and even easier) in the darkroom.
In fact, the best double-exposure I think I have seen is the one at
TOPE1. Forgot who the gentleman is, but in his picture he's evidently
gambling with himself over Zuiko-glass.
How many of you guys actually take double-exposures? And how much do you
take?
--
Mange hilsner / Sincerely
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|