| Subject: | Re: [OM] life span of OM's |
|---|---|
| From: | "Robert Gannon Gries" <rggriesphoto@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 02 Mar 2001 19:35:57 -0600 |
i thought we already discussed the inappropriateness of 35mm lenses for
digital work - if you want digital, still follow olympus and look at the
E-10!
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] life span of OM's, Joel Wilcox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] My KC-135 TOPE1 experience (kinda long), Bruce Appelbaum |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] life span of OM's (OM-2 observation), John Hermanson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] life span of OM's, Ray Moth |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |