Zuiko lenses are "All Good"! 8*0 With the possible exception of the
Cosina made ones (I do like them IMOWW %^)).
I have the 24 f/2.8 and 28 f/3.5. Both are very sharp and produce
excellent images. If I had to make a choice I would go with the 24 f2.8
and leave the rest alone.
I guess it really all depends on a) your budget and b) what light
conditions you'll be shooting in most.
Was the local guy trying to sell you a lens? The f/2 24's, 28's and 35's
tend to be two or three times the price of the f2.8 versions.
-Charles Packard
dane skye wrote:
>
> Hi-
> I am trying to decide which lenses to buy/which are the "good ones".
<snip>
> For example, I want a 24mm- is the Zuiko 2.8 or 2 the way to go? The Reese
> tests make it look like the 2.8 is the one, but a local guy said the 2 was
> the better in the 24 and 35mm lengths and the 2.8 was as good in the 28.
> The Reese tests leave me with the 24/2.8 and 28/2 as the better. see what I
> mean.
>
> Anyway, if you have an opinion you would like to share, I would be
> appreciative.
>
> Thanks!!!!
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|