ML Archiv: RE: [OM] RE: [OT] Reliability and aesthetics

Subject:	RE: [OM] RE: [OT] Reliability and aesthetics - was second body
From:	"Brian P. Huber" <bphuber@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 20 Jan 2001 18:17:17 -0500

Running in damp weather...

Brian P. Huber


 
> Define good :-)
> Andrew
> 
> >The problem is finding one good Jaguar!


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] second body, (continued) RE: [OM] second body, Bill Brooks RE: [OM] second body, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] second body, Larry [OM] Re: [OT] second body, Andrew Fildes RE: [OM] second body, James N. McBride Re: [OM] second body, W. J. Liles Re: [OM] second body, John Hudson RE: [OM] second body, James N. McBride RE: [OM] second body, Brian P. Huber [OM] RE: [OT] Reliability and aesthetics - was second body, Andrew Fildes RE: [OM] RE: [OT] Reliability and aesthetics - was second body, Brian P. Huber <= RE: [OM] RE: [OT] Reliability and aesthetics - was second body, Andrew Fildes [OM] Some E-10 Test shots, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Some E-10 Test shots, Richard Keefer Re: [OM] Some E-10 Test shots, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Some E-10 Test shots, Richard Keefer Re: [OM] Some E-10 Test shots, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Some E-10 Test shots, c.e.packard Re: [OM] Some E-10 Test shots, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Some E-10 Test shots, c.e.packard RE: [OM] In regard to tripods, Brian P. Huber

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] What actually is the rarest lens or piece of OM equipment?, clintonr
Next by Date:	[OM] OM-G manual, Chuck Norcutt
Previous by Thread:	[OM] RE: [OT] Reliability and aesthetics - was second body, Andrew Fildes
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] RE: [OT] Reliability and aesthetics - was second body, Andrew Fildes
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] RE: [OT] Reliability and aesthetics - was second body