Subject: | RE: [OM] second body |
---|---|
From: | "James N. McBride" <jnmcbr@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Jan 2001 22:12:26 -0700 |
Actually the ones I know of that are of vintage 1985 and newer have been quite reliable. The sheet metal will still bend in collisions though. /jnm > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of W. J. Liles > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 8:21 PM > To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [OM] second body > > > James N. McBride wrote: > > > > Jaguars even stopped dripping oil. That's progress! /jnm > > > > > Sacrilege!!! > > Next you'll tell me they're reliable transportation! > > Jerry Liles > > > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Do 21mm Zuiko's give you fish-eye effect?, John Prosper |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Film to flange distance in various OM bodies, HI100 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] second body, John Hudson |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] second body, Brian P. Huber |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |