Subject: | Re: [OM] Examples of the slower lens being the better choice? |
---|---|
From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:07:38 -0600 |
I'm not convinced that is fair. A few of the 's' lenses were targeted that way (75-150, 35-70/4), but I don't think the slow/fast was amateur/pro. Tom From: "Dirk Wright" <wright@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <snip> > I'm thinking that the slower lenses were built as "starter" or "amatuer" > lenses, and the faster ones built as "professional". <snip> -- > Be Seeing You. > Dirk Wright < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Examples of the slower lens being the better choice?, Dirk Wright |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Aircraft ammunition pictures, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Examples of the slower lens being the better choice?, Dirk Wright |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Examples of the slower lens being the better choice?, Winsor Crosby |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |