Dear Gary
Pardon what might seem to be an elementary question, I would like to hear an
opinion without going into very technical discussions as I have limited
knowledge of such fine information. The bottom line would be, how usefull
would the Vivitar be in actual use, how big a print can be made and still
have acceptable resolution?
Is the Zuiko orginal worthe the money for average use?
Regards
titoy
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] vivitar lens series ID
>Titoy writes:
>
><< Somebody pls tell how we can identify a lens as "series one"? Do
>those words appear on the lens barrel? >>
>
>Yes.
>
><< How does the Vivitar Series 1 35-80/2.8 compare with a Zuiko 35 - 105
>zoom in overall quality? I have seen them sell at over US $ 200 on ebay.
>Is the Zuiko worth it at a price more than double than that of the
>Vivitar? >>
>
>You are comparing apples to oranges here. What would you like to know
>that the Olympus OM System Lens Tests don't already reveal? I'll try
>and determine it if it is on my test slides or general picture taking
>slides.
>
>Gary Reese
>Las Vegas, NV
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|