on 12/20/00 6:44 PM, T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx at T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Anyways, I know that several of the list members have such, and I have
> read parts of the discussions from the past in the archives. However
> technology is moving fast so I take the liberty of asking. Which negative
> scanners are good/bad/ok? Which would be the "equivalent of the
> OM2s/p" (aka: the best game in town) and which should I stay far far away
> from?
Look at the Minolta Dimage Dual Scan II if you want to avoid hard flying
objects due to spending all the food $$ for the next year. See it
http://www.minoltaeurope.com/pe/filmscanner/dimagesd_ii.html
Join the Film Scanners mailing list at
http://www.cix.co.uk/~tsphoto/tech/filmscan/maillist.htm
for advice. This is a high volume list so you might want to start with the
digest mode.
>
> I hope I am not too much off topic wih this posting......
>
> Mange hilsner / Sincerely
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Thomas Heide Clausen
> Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
> M.Sc in Computer Engineering
>
> E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
> -------------------------------------------
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|