Subject: | Re: [OM] Is lens size important ? |
---|---|
From: | wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:55:09 +1100 |
CH wrote: > Yes, it has to be very large, otherwise no one will notice you are holding a > lens cost over $1000. Same case for the Contax 21/2.8, it is three Sounds right, he said it cost him $AU1200 several years ago (when the $AU was worth more). ...Wayne < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] No Film Costs! Hurrah!, John Hermanson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: 40/2, Skip Williams |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Is lens size important ?, C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | [OM] mint cameras; SX-70, William Sommerwerck |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |