Subject: | Re: [OM] filter for 350mm f2.8 |
---|---|
From: | "John Palmer" <john.palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:40:38 -0000 |
Giles says > Why would you want to potentially degrade the performance > of such a high performance lens by sticking a filter in front of it? > Gary Reese's tests of filters clearly indicate that there is a high > probability they will degrade the image quality. I'm thinking of getting one for the 250/2 for use on rainy days. Even with the fairly deep hood the front element gets raindrops on it. The difference in quality degradation between raindrops and raindrops plus filter is probably quite small. John < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] 40mm lenses was: my first go at the list, Richard Schaetzl |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] A reminder of THE RULE, John Palmer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] filter for 350mm f2.8, Lex Jenkins |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] filter for 350mm f2.8, Giles |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |