ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!

from John Cwiklinski

Subject:	Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!
From:	"John Cwiklinski" <johncw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:38:37 -0800

Chris O'Neill wrote:

> That's REALLY weird!!!  This message took almost 12 hours from the time I 
sent it (8:13 am) to the time it came back to me > as a list message (7:52 
pm)!!!  I wonder why????

It went through Florida to be re-counted. (just kidding!)

________________
John Cwiklinski
(just happy to have Olympus gear)

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, coneill Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, Gregg Iverson [OM] List Down??, Craig Henrikson Re: [OM] List Down??, frieder . faig Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, David Irisarri Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, Chris O'Neill Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, lclark Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, John Cwiklinski <= OT Recounts was: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, Gregg Iverson Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, Paul D. Farrar [OM] test only, Dr Peter Gilbert Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, John O'Regan

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Zuiko 35mm vs. Medium Format, Winsor Crosby
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Re: OM-2000, c.e. packard
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, lclark
Next by Thread:	OT Recounts was: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, Gregg Iverson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]