ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!

from DaEyeGuy

Subject:	Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!
From:	DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx
Date:	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:12:25 EST

In a message dated 11/22/00 11:03:06 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
coneill@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> P.S.  Sent at 8:50 am.  (Just one last test, folks!)
I received this at 11:03 est...not bad...

Susan Steele
Virginia USA

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, coneill Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, Gregg Iverson [OM] List Down??, Craig Henrikson Re: [OM] List Down??, frieder . faig Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, DaEyeGuy <= Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, David Irisarri Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, Chris O'Neill Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, lclark Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, John Cwiklinski OT Recounts was: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, Gregg Iverson Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, Paul D. Farrar [OM] test only, Dr Peter Gilbert Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, John O'Regan

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] A Day Of Thanks, Ken Norton
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Diopters, Glasses, etc. and Lasik, Ken Norton
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] List Down??, frieder . faig
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Slower than snail mail!, David Irisarri
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]