Ray Moth <ray_moth@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 3. I can recommend the 21/3.5, from personal experience. It's tiny
> (about the same size as your 28/2.8) and gives excellent results.
I can echo Ray's sentiments - it's a great lens. Some slight
vignetting at f3.5 but otherwise excellent.
During my Nikon period, I acquired (besides strained muscles and an aching
shoulder) a Nikkor 20/2.8 lens. This is a very good lens, and I was
slightly concerned that the Zuiko might not offer the same quality. I took
some test shots of a building with both the Nikkor and the Zuiko that I was
considering purchasing, scanned then in at 2400 dpi, and compared the
results. They were, as far as I coould see, identical.
True, the Nikkor has an extra half stop or so, but then again it's twice
the size.
Alasdair
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|