ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses

Subject:	Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses
From:	"Chris O'Neill" <coneill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 10 Nov 2000 22:39:25 -0700

On 11 Nov 2000, at 0:13, Giles wrote:

> Avoid the 35-80/2.8, despite the 16 elements the contrast is not low.

Damned Olympus!  They can't even make a crappy 16 element lens!

(Sigh!)

Chris

P.S.  <Grin!>

---
I'm *not* a Zuikoholic....  I'm a Zuikohobbiest!
Chris O'Neill (coneill@xxxxxxxxxxx)
http://www.nucleus.com/~coneill

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, (continued) Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Keith Berry Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, - DORIS FANG - Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, P Bernad RE: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Brian P. Huber Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, John A. Lind Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, John Prosper Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, - DORIS FANG - Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Giles Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Chris O'Neill <= Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Lex Jenkins Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Chris O'Neill Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Toni Campos Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, John Prosper Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Simon Evans Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Ray Moth Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, John Hudson Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, John Hudson

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, John A. Lind
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] macro, P Bernad
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Giles
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Moderate Contrast Lenses, Lex Jenkins
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]