For me not, I like the f3.5, the color and contrast is more pleasing.
The F2 is too sharp and contrast for me, I sold the F2 because it was
sold at a very good price (~$400). If I have lot of money to spend on
OM I will keep both.
C.H.Ling
Jim Terazawa wrote:
>
> Thanks Lex,
>
> So, is this the general concensus that people favor the 50/f3.5 over
> f2.0 becaus of its cost ?
>
> Jim Terazawa
>
> Lex Jenkins wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Regarding popularity, cost must certainly be a factor. With the average
> > price of the 50/3.5 under $200 for an excellent used specimen, many of us
> > would be hard pressed to justify the cost of a 50/2.
> > ---
> > Lex
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|