Subject: | [OM] Zuiko 50mm Macro (Was: One lens, one body) |
---|---|
From: | Jim Terazawa <jimt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 06 Nov 2000 14:40:28 -0600 |
Thanks Lex, So, is this the general concensus that people favor the 50/f3.5 over f2.0 becaus of its cost ? Jim Terazawa Lex Jenkins wrote: <snip> > Regarding popularity, cost must certainly be a factor. With the average > price of the 50/3.5 under $200 for an excellent used specimen, many of us > would be hard pressed to justify the cost of a 50/2. > --- > Lex < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1954....NO BODY COPY!, Rick Beckrich |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Scanning and File size mystery, DAVDOU9211 |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [[OM] One lens, one body, Chip Stratton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 50mm Macro (Was: One lens, one body), B.B. Bean |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |