Subject: | Re: [OM] If you had to choose only ONE body . . . |
---|---|
From: | Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:47:17 +0200 |
OM2N or OM1N. I find it more satisfying to use than the OM4. Chris Dear All, I'm posting this question to the list because a few people have hinted at it: "If you had to choose only ONE M/OM body for all your 35mm photography, which would it be?" This can mean any full-frame 35mm Olympus SLR body, including M-1, OM-1, 1MD, 1n, 2, 2n, 2S, 3, 3Ti, 4, 4T(i), 10, 10QD, 10FC, 20(G), 30(F), 40(PC), 2000. (This may look like a formiddable list of models but I personally find the Oly range a heck of a lot more logical that the C*nt*x range!) Regards, ===== Ray -- <|_:-)_|> Chris Barker imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ... a nascent photo library. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Keeper of the Bear, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] If you had to choose only ONE body . . ., Motor Sport Visions Photography |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] If you had to choose only ONE body . . ., Terry and Tracey |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] If you had to choose only ONE body . . ., Robinsnes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |