Tom,
Some kinds of batteries may be hard to get by in certain parts of the
world, but even a lifetime supply of 357 silver cells for the 4T can
find a place somewhere in your camera bag where you wouldn't even
notice it.
I use the column of my small but virtually always present table tripod
to hold a few spare 357's for the 4T and two mercury cells for the
OM-1. Likewise the leg of my Manfrotto monopod is always filled up
with at least 4 AA cells. Same applies for one (marked!) leg of the
tripod.
Frank van Lindert
Utrecht NL.
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 07:05:09 -0500, "Tom Scales"
<tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I actually find this question more difficult than the lens choice (and I
>chose the 35-70, instead of the 35-80 and I own both).
>
>A big part of me says my original OM-1MD, in scuffed black. No batteries
>required, reliable, rugged and a lot of sentimental value.
>
>The other part of me says OM-4T, also scuff and bruised, but flexible and
>powerful.
>
>A very small part of my brain says: "the 3Ti, you idiot", but that part of
>my brain shouts a lot and gets really annoying, so I tend to ignore it.
>
>I suppose the choice would come down to 'are batteries available'? If so,
>the 4Ti. If not, the 1.
>
>Sure I can't take'em all?
>
>Tom
>
>From: "Ray Moth" <ray_moth@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> "If you had to choose only ONE M/OM body for all your 35mm photography,
>> which would it be?"
>>
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|