35-80.
Reasoning: if I am allowed to choose only one lens instead of the many
I usually take with me, it can be heavy and bulky and I will still
think it's small and light!
2nd choice: 35-105 (gaining length at cost of quality and speed)
Frank van Lindert.
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 06:15:56 -0500, "Tom Scales"
<tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>35-70/3.5-4.5. I was tempted to say the 35-80, but it's size and weight
>pushed me back to the 35-70.
>
>Tom
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I'd like to ask a (dumb?) question of the List . . . if you had to
>> choose only ONE Zuiko lens to use on your OM body, to cover all your
>> 'conventional' photographic needs (excluding macro, document copying,
>> astro, medical and other scientific), what would it be?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> =====
>> Ray
>>
>> "The trouble with resisting temptation is
>> you never know when you'll get another chance!"
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
>> http://mail.yahoo.com/
>>
>> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|