In a message dated 10/06/2000 10:57:52 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> My only question (not having any wedding experience to add), is why the 2s
> instead of the 2n. The 2n does TTL and if the 2S is flaky, I wouldn't risk
> it. Just my thoughts. Otherwise, it seems like a good kit to me.
Woops, maybe I made a typo. It's the OM-2n that's flaky, not the OM-2S. The
OM-2S, along with my original OM-1, has been the most trouble free camera I
own. The OM-4 has been perfect as well, ever since it went to John H. last
year.
Paul Schings
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|