I have a bunch of Supra that I just bought, 100,400,800. I'll use it as my
soccer film and scan the results for the 'world' to see. First pics this
weekend.
Tom
> At 10:38 AM 9/6/2000 EDT, you wrote:
> >Let me weigh in on the side of the new Supra. I've shot and scanned both
> the
> >100 and 400 asa Supra. I love the saturation and contrast of both
speeds.
> >The 400 lets me use my 35-70 f/4 and my 75-150 f/4 at their most
desirable
> >apertures and at high shutter speeds.
> >
> >I have scanned both and find them to be super sharp. Additionally, the
skin
> >tones rival Portra and the Supra doesn't require special processing
channels
> >or special handling like Portra. I get it for a lower price at the local
> pro
> >shop than one pays for Gold, so for a negative film, I think it's the
film
> of
> >choice for me.
> >Dave Dougherty
>
> Dave,
> I've shot some Supra 100 and I'll probably go back for more. I'm curious
> about the 400. Any reason to prefer it to Royal Gold 400 (which seems to
> me to be extremely good)?
>
> Joel Wilcox
> Iowa City, Iowa USA
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|