Joel Wilcox wrote:
I would like to shoot Kodachrome again, but you never know what you're
going to get. Perhaps the latest Select version is better.
I don't think Kodachrome has changed in decades. Select is merely
re-packaging. Even the pro Kodachrome was exactly the same stock as the
amateur film.
If you get a Kodachrome that's gone green, now that's an ugly green.
The bane of my years with this film. Ugly is an understatement!! Yes, when
Kodachrome works it is wonderful. But it is too picky with its subject
matter/lighting. I love Erwin's recently discussed photos - they demonstrate
its qualities. But those of use who are satisfied with the palette of E6
films will probably never return. The bas-relief and great sharpness are a
product of its unique chemistry: it is a 3-layer b&w film, where the colours
are added during (complex) processing. This also gives it unmatched
stability when exposed to extremes of temperature and humidity.
I was suprised Joel commented that he found Astia too bland - the
differences are very small. However, tastes vary. There are some Kodachrome
die-hards on this list, and each film has its qualities. It is a matter of
matching the film to your subject, lighting and personal preferences.
Simon E.
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|