Subject: | RE: [OT] hifi was:[OM] Lens Test |
---|---|
From: | "John Cwiklinski/Beaverton/Contr/IBM" <johncw@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:26:07 -0700 |
Continued off-topic: Michael Stephens wrote: >I would liken Leica to Audio Research or maybe Jadis >Olympus would be more like Naim or Linn Dirk Wright wrote: >Oh, that's *bad*. Olympus is *much* better than that Pianear crap. Let me see, working >backwards, I can say that the "Leica" of audio gear *has* to be McIntosh. I'd say that the >"Olympus" of audio gear is probably more like Luxman or Nakamichi. From your list of "namebrands", it looks more like "Heathkit" quality from what I can see (except for McIntosh). Sorry, Pioneer rules for analog. They own 240f the hardware patents during that era. Could never figure out AR, Inc. or whatever they called themselves as each month progressed. Then they went bust after 3 or 4 years. #1 speaker: Bose 901 series Digital Stereo - According to Julian Hirsch (Stereo Review) "...doesn't really matter anymore". ________________ John Cwiklinski < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 2 more OM-1 questions, Rand E. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] OM-PC and Bounce Grip, Brian P. Huber |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OT] hifi was:[OM] Lens Test, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OT] hifi was:[OM] Lens Test, Lex Jenkins |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |