Remember the 85 isn't macro sharp. You don't want to see that many wrinkles
and blemishes on the model's face.
Foxy
----- Original Message -----
> I'm a bit surprised that you aren't pleased with the 85/2 as it is one of
my
> favorite lenses. The 35/2 isn't my favorite, just because almost every
zoom
> I own goes that wide. As for the 35-80/2.8, it is an amazing lens, but
> combines heavy with expensive. If I am only carrying a body and a lens,
> that's the one I often carry (although the 35-70/3.5-4.5 gets just as much
> use).
>
> Me, I'd try to find a nice 35-70/3.5-4.5 first. The 35-80/2.8 goes for
> close to $1000 used ($1300 new at B&H).
>
> Tom
>
> > Hello, can someone give me a list of sites containing comparative lens
> tests
> > (apart from those linked to this site).
> > I remember looking at something called photopod was it?
> >
> > Also I'm not too impressed with the performance of the zuiko 35mm F2 and
> 85
> > F2, is it worth replacing these with a 2.8 35-80 zoom. I'm very happy
with
> > the 100 2.8 and 90 f2.
> >
> > How much is said zoom (US price for mint), I know its heavy.
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|