Boy! Talk about the possibilities for an OT firestorm--but I agree that
the irony here is very revealing of where we are as a society. When
will unltasound images of the fetus become "obscene"?
John P
Gregg wrote:
>
> Not meaning to start a thread discussing the legality of either, but does
> anyone notice an inconsistancy in the judicial system when one can abort,
> but not photograph in the buff, an fetus/infant?
>
> Gregg
>
> Garry Lewis pointed out:>
> >
> > Take under advisement
> >
> >
> http://www.apbnews.com/newscenter/breakingnews/2000/03/07/kidporn0307_01.htm
> l
> >
> > The old world of "artistic expression" longer exists when it comes to
> child nudity. Be careful,
> > an innocent serendipitous photo could land you a legal stigmata of child
> abuser and panderer.
> >
> > yours understanding the fear of lost childhood, but fearing the scared mob
> mentality,
> >
> > Garry D. Lewis
> > --
> > a day without an Olympus camera is like a day without "Sunny 16"
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|