Re: [OM] [OT] And for Your Next Assignment -Reply

[Lex Jenkins]

I'm inclined to wonder about the moral integrity and sexual orientation of 
the person who is so offended by the mere nudity of a child as to consider 
it pornographic.
Regarding CPS, is there a more incompetent bunch of pinheads in any 
bureaucracy?
This has me so fired up I'm gonna hafta take the OM-1 out for a spin and 
photograph some bareass naked petrified wood buildings.
Lex

> From: Scott Nelson <SNelson@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] And for Your Next Assignment -Reply
> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:51:47 -0400
>
> Well, that's why digital is the wave of the child porn future. There's no
> processor to blow the whistle. Seriously, this subject has become 
> absolutely
> Kafkaesque. "Child Protective Services" has become the dreaded knock in the
> middle of the night.
>
> >>> Garry Lewis <glewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 07/24/00 12:10pm >>>
>
>
> Take under advisement
>
> http://www.apbnews.com/newscenter/breakingnews/2000/03/07/kidporn0307_01.html
>
>  The old world of "artistic expression" longer exists when it comes to 
> child
> nudity.  Be careful,
> an innocent serendipitous photo could land you a legal stigmata of child 
> abuser
> and panderer.
>
>         yours understanding the fear of lost childhood, but fearing the scared
> mob mentality,
>
>                                                 Garry D. Lewis
> --
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >