The first line of course should read 'buyer' instead of 'seller'.
sorry...
Frank.
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:54:44 +0200, Frank van Lindert
<lindertv@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Barry,
>
>I do know who the seller is, although I have never done business with
>him and do not know him personally.
>I think that he is right when he says that you were the cause of his
>misunderstanding with M.C., and when he blames you for your 'gibing'
>interference.
>
>You should have thought earlier of the fact that it would be wiser to
>keep your mouth shut. What reason did you have to gibe at him, as he
>was unknown to you? I think it is you who owes apologies to both
>people, of which one now has negative feedback as a result of your
>meddlesomeness. You say that the man 'thought he was being
>harassed'... well he was, by you.
>
>When a person backs out of an auction, it is only the business of the
>seller - who reacted correctly and gave him negative feedback. That is
>enough punishment as it is. The buyer must have felt guilty too,
>because he didn't leave negative feedback for the seller - until you
>meddled in their business...
>
>Just my two cents...
>
>Frank van Lindert
>Utrecht NL
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|