Subject: | Re: [OM] Re: Holes in the OM line (was "Cossina cranks out...") |
---|---|
From: | "Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:32:52 +0000 |
Take a 180/2, add a 65-116 auto extension tube, add a 1.4x TC and you have something that behaves somewhat like the desired object. Giles Joel Wilcox wrote: > A 200mm macro would be a fitting addition. > > A 1.4 TC I could afford. :( > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] 39mm lens use, Gareth Knight |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] In the interests of preserving the viability of the OM, Giles |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Holes in the OM line (was "Cossina cranks out..."), Per Nordenberg |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Holes in the OM line (was "Cossina cranks out..."), Joel Wilcox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |