Subject: | Re: [OM] Fw: Cossina cranks out a retro-range finder camera, why Olympus |
---|---|
From: | Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 24 Jun 2000 18:15:55 -0700 |
>I'm curious on your comment about the holes in the lens line. What do you >consider missing? If I may butt in here.....How about: 35/1.4 or 1.8 85/1.4 or 1.8 50/1.0 80-200/2.8 Fast and long are missing. 350/2.8 with a doubler is not good enough. A 600/4 and/or a 1000/8 is essential to birders and other wildlife photographers who don't shoot in a zoo. -- : Jan Steinman <mailto:Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : Bytesmiths <http://www.bytesmiths.com> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Fw: Cossina cranks out a retro-range finder camera, why Olympus, Jan Steinman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Holes in the OM line (was "Cossina cranks out..."), Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Fw: Cossina cranks out a retro-range finder camera, why Olympus, Tom Scales |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Holes in the OM line (was "Cossina cranks out..."), Joel Wilcox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |