Hi Tom...I agree...I've found the lens to cover a good range with good
results...Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Scales <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, June 26, 2000 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Newcomer... Hi all !!!
>You know, everyone seems to think the 75-150 isn't great, but I disagree.
>Maybe the 'numbers' aren't, but I love the combination of size and weight
>and find the outcome very agreeable.
>
>Just me.
>
>Tom
>From: "Francois Corriveau" <francoiscorriveau@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>> Hi Jordan
>>
>> Welcome to the list!
>>
>> I'm not the most experienced member, but I can give you a few hints. The
>> 75-150 F4 is indeed lighwieght and small (hey, it's a Zuiko): I know
image
>> quality is good but it's not the best Zuiko. The 100 2.8 is a lovely
lens,
>I
>> think it's better than the 75-150. you can check out Gary Reese's
>incerdible
>> lens test page at:
>>
>> http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>> Francois
>>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|