Well, that was supposed to be for John H., but well, I guess everyone can
give me their opinion!
From: "Francois Corriveau" <francoiscorriveau@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Om-2s, om-4...
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:44:39 EDT
Hi Jhon,
Sorry to bother you offline, but I need your advice. My local repair shop
told me to stay away from om-2s, om-4(t,ti) because they will break more
often than om-2(n) and om-1(n). What do you think?
Thanks for taking the time to respond!
Francois
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|