On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 10:45:58AM -0400, ClassicVW@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I know Canon did a long time ago.
> I just don't see a need for a 50/ 1.0
> Maybe it's my style and subjects that don't need it.
> I haven't wanted anything faster than a 1.8 or 1.4. Have you?
I like to do people shots in existing light, especially for things like
parties. (I think a flash is too disruptive at times like that; I want to
get what's happening, not what people want the camera to see.) There have
been times that having another half-stop over the 55/1.2 wouldn't hurt.
(Then again, my dad and I had a discussion after his 40th anniversary party,
which I shot like that; next time, he'll get Portra 400 instead of
160...even so, the pictures had a nice, intimate quality from being a bit
underexposed, in tungsten light.)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|