Subject: | Re: [OM] Fw: Cossina cranks out a retro-range finder camera, why Olympus |
---|---|
From: | ClassicVW@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sun, 25 Jun 2000 10:45:58 EDT |
I know Canon did a long time ago. I just don't see a need for a 50/ 1.0 Maybe it's my style and subjects that don't need it. I haven't wanted anything faster than a 1.8 or 1.4. Have you? George S. Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > I'm not sure about "current," but I believe Canon sold a 50/1.0. > > >and what *real* advantage would there be over a 50/1.4? > > Um, one whole stop -- more than the difference between a 1.8 and a 1.4? > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] slide scanner?, John A. Lind |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Fw: Cossina cranks out a retro-range finder camera, why Olympus, Jay Maynard |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Fw: Cossina cranks out a retro-range finder camera, why Olympus, Jan Steinman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Fw: Cossina cranks out a retro-range finder camera, why Olympus, Jay Maynard |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |