Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re:minimum carry kits

Subject: Re: [OM] Re:minimum carry kits
From: "Lex Jenkins" <lexjenkins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 21:30:36 PDT
Mike, the minimum carry kit you mentioned is almost exactly what I carried as a journalist years ago. Mine was a Ricoh SLR, 28/2.8, 50/1.8 and 135/2.8. A small auto flash, some rolls of Tri-X and two or three notebooks. That's about it. Some of my best photos were taken with that gear, work related and personal artistic stuff. I didn't even own a tripod back then. Wouldn't have used it anyway, and don't like to use one now if I can get around it.

If I were a working PJ today I'd probably want some a bit wider, maybe a 20mm, a faster normal lens like a 50/1.2, and a moderate tele-zoom, something in the 70-150 range. I'd rather keep it small and add a teleconverter than have to lug around something like a 70-200/2.8. I'd probably use Vivitar's macro focusing 2x converter to serve double duty for macro work, unless I really needed to travel light, in which case I'd skip the teleconverter and take a close up diopter.

I suppose a compact winder/motor drive would be convenient mostly as a grip, and for the rare occasions when rapid shooting might actually be an advantage.

Even now I doubt I'd carry much more other than for certain anticipated shooting opportunities.

A PJ whose work I really admire, Mark Milstein of Atlantic News Service, does his most dramatic work with a wide angle (20mm I think). That takes a lot of courage to get into the thick of things for the lens to do its job.
---
Lex
-------------------------------------------------
Visit "Vistas Tejas" at http://www.photoscene.com
<a href="http://www.photoscene.com";>Visit Vistas Tejas</a>

From: miaim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That recent trip was an interesting learning experience.

I started wondering why carrying what has been lauded as one of the
smallest of SLR cameras was causing bursitis in my shoulder. Clearly I was doing something very wrong.

At the moment, I can't think of too much that would fall under the category of routine documentary type stuff that couldn't be done with a battery consisting of just a 28mm/2.8, a 50 macro, (for those odd occasions) and a 100/2.8.

I'm still very much learning this craft and would appreciate comments from those who've tried this approach and found it lacking.

Thanks,
Mike Swaim

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz