On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 06:14:14PM +1000, Frank Ernens wrote:
> Tom Trottier wrote
>
> > Perhaps we Oly users shouldn't be so sanguine about the quality of
> > our lenses... [data from photodo]
>
> There are some other anomalies in the tests there:
>
>
> It's unclear whether film and bodies were used in the
> tests. If so, the ranking could have been influenced by
> vibration. Pentax and Minolta are well known for good
> damping, Nikons vary IME, the Blad has that thumping
> great mirror; and Olympus could be better.
>
The MTF-Testing Method uses a MTF Testing arramgement without cameras.
As far as I know is the lens used like in a slide projector.
It renders the testing grid to an optic-sensor which meassures the
image quality. So there is no influence due to camera body qualities,
and There is no film used.
Frieder Faig
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|