Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Other ultra-wides?

Subject: Re: [OM] Other ultra-wides?
From: frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 00:31:13 +0200
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 09:14:45AM -0700, Jan Steinman wrote:

> 
> Yes, hand-held, overcast shadow, Kodak Gold 100. My guess is that it 
> was wide-open, with perhaps 1/15th of a second or so, but that's on a 
> tape somewhere I haven't transcribed.
> 
> Of course, "hand held" means I was lying on my belly, propping my 
> elbows on the ground and pressing the camera to my face, so there was 
> a tripod, of sorts. :-)

Wow, what a photograph.

Now it causes me into more surprise, because my calculator says,
that the 2.0/21 cranked  to close focus with an additional 7mm
extension tube is about 1:2 scale-ratio. So youre having pretty much depth of 
field for an
f/2 macroshot. 
In any case a pretty fine work for a handheld photo at all.
 
Frieder Faig



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz