>On my examples, at least, I find that the 2N has a greater usable
range
>for TTL flash than the 4T. It will handle closer distances and wider
>apertures by about 1 stop or so. This means its TTL system is faster
>reacting. This may be due to using analog electronics for TTL shutoff
>rather than emulating then with a digital computer.
>
I really doubt that the 4T has a microprocessor in it. I could be wrong
of course.
Be seeing you.
Dirk Wright
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|