On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Garry Lewis wrote:
> >>>What's wrong with "heptagonal"? and in the interest of scientific rigour
> >>>we should try decagonal, dodecagonal and
> duodecagonal at least.<<
>
> All this AGONIZING over AGONALS has caused me AGONY and I think I'm AGONA
> have a headache.
You're all lucky I'm not an organic chemist, otherwise I'd be waffling
on about agonists and antagonists by now ;)
> BTW, the door on the birdcage was left open so-POLYGON
Didn't leave enough polyfilla, so she had to escape to search for food,
obviously.
--
________________________________________________________________________
* | |
| / | |/-\ | Ian A. Nichols |
| | | | | | |
| \-/| | / | i.a.nichols@xxxxxxxxxx |
| * iann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|