ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OM

Subject:	Re: [OM] OM - RIP
From:	sje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	Wed, 2 Feb 2000 14:40:33 +0000

Why introduce the high-end OM3Ti only 5(?) years ago, and the (albeit
Cosina-made) OM2000 if they had plans to phase out OM? Doesn't make sense.
And why would Oly USA want to lend Doug Dubler an OM outfit for the PT
article? Same applies to Jon Tarrant's OM4Ti review in BJP the other week.

Simon E.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Mechanical Shutter Exercises [was] OM - RIP, (continued) [OM] Mechanical Shutter Exercises [was] OM - RIP, John A. Lind [OM] Anyone have these parts?, Chip Stratton RE: [OM] Anyone have these parts?, Edward Heler, Ph.D. Re: [OM] OM - RIP, WKato Re: [OM] OM - RIP, Garth Wood [OM] OM - RIP, Phillip Franklin Re: [OM] OM - RIP, John Hermanson Re: [OM] OM - RIP, Samuel Morales Re: [OM] OM - RIP, Giles Re: [OM] OM - RIP, Samuel Morales Re: [OM] OM - RIP, sje <= Re: [OM] OM - RIP, Samuel Morales

Previous by Date:	[OM] Gasparilla in Tampa Bay, ~$elena Goth ~
Next by Date:	[OM] ADITL <-> OLTE/ZAST, Olaf Greve
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM - RIP, Samuel Morales
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM - RIP, Samuel Morales
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM - RIP