On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, george wrote:
|The 35-80/2.8 closest focus is about 2 feet. The 90/2 gets down to 1.3
|feet, which is 1:2 So, the 35-80 at 80mm and 2ft distance would be appx
|1:5 or so. I guess that's fairly good for a zoom. I wouldn't expect to
|get 90/2 performance out of it. Gary's #s at 4 ft and 1:40 look great.
|But if you want a macro lens, get to 50 or 90 F/2
Alternatively, if you doneed the zoom, be advised that the 35-80/2.8's
62mm filter size is a perfect match for Nikon'shigh quality 5T (+1.5)
& 6T (+2.9) acromat diopters.
|ALEXSCIFI@xxxxxxx wrote:
|>
|> Would some of you who use this, comment on it's quality at the it's closest
|> focusing distances (less than 4 feet) as compared to the 90 or 100 F2.0
|> lenses?
|>
|> Thanks
|>
|> Alex
|>
|> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
|> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
|> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
|< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
|< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
|< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
|
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|