Subject: | Re: [OM] 200/5...just ONE bad apple? |
---|---|
From: | "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 14 Dec 1999 21:53:52 +1100 |
> By way of anecdote.......Out of 20 or so excellent Zuikos, I had a 35/2.8 > Zuiko which was an under performer. I got another example and it performed > much better. Someone posted that this lens had some come out with the front element reversed. Olympus US fixed them for free. This may have been your problem. Foxy < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1291, Ian A. Nichols |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] the future of OM, Skip Williams |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/5...just ONE bad apple?, Kurt Hurley |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/5...just ONE bad apple?, lclark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |