I read somewhere that the OM2000 was actually Popular Photograaphy's top ten for
1998. The review they gave stated that the levers, gears, and other interior
parts
were made of metal and looked durable..
Here' some links to reviews on the OM2000:
http://www.rangefinder-network.com/archive/first_exp_olympus_0798.html
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/nikonfmseries/fm10/index.htm
http://www.veluwen.demon.nl/om-sif/bodygroup/om2000.htm
Hope this helps!
jim mueller
Ingemar Uvhagen wrote:
> Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
> > I can use it alongside my OM-2S and OM-4T with
> > complete confidence that the results will be indistinguishable.
> >
> > I realize that you did not specifically indict the OM2000 as a "crappy"
> > camera. But the informal logic of "I had a bad Cosina experience, therefore
> > the OM2000 is a bad camera" would be an easy but incorrect inference. So
> > far as I can tell at least.
>
> Joel,
> as you own and use an OM2000, what is your impression about its quality
> compared to an OM-10? What I am thinking of is the build quality - if there
> are
> any plastic things inside like the OM-10?
> Will the OM2000 suffer from *some kind of* "sticky magnet problem" in the
> future? After all, the camera is quite new on market. What will it perform in
> lets say 10 years from now?
>
> Just wondering.
>
> --
> Regards/
> Ingemar Uvhagen
> Gislaved, Sweden
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|